Owner Scale
Resource, role and ability to direct creation.
TrO shows role acceptance and retention for the selected transition. The number O is not a numerical multiplier of a person.
Learning Model · Nine Owner and Company Transitions · From Idea to New Capability.
In order to implement a new idea, I develop myself and a tool capable of realizing it. The animations below reveal these components using the example of company transitions.
Resource, role and ability to direct creation.
TrO shows role acceptance and retention for the selected transition. The number O is not a numerical multiplier of a person.
The value, system and ability of the company to realize the idea.
AI01–10 shows a separate tool capability coordinate. Levels O0–O9 and AI01–AI10 are not interchangeable.
Validation: what actually appeared, for whom it works and what facts confirm it. The result brings us back to clarifying the idea, one's role and the tool.
Illustrative scheme: it shows a holistic concept of the components of creation. Apply it wisely to a specific plan, taking into account all significant external and internal factors. The sign × denotes the joint action of the components; this scheme does not specify the numerical calculation of the scale.
Choose an ingredient. We analyze the current transition for the company; the mission and competence of the creation have their own criteria and are not determined by the O number.
The new level has its own proof. O4 does not mean "twice as much" as O2. A single owner can have companies at different O levels. Mission and crafting abilities are also not graded automatically.
Each competence has its own subject. Kv refers to the construction and ownership of the instrument; Kstv refers to the implementation of a new idea. They can overlap. One piece of evidence does not automatically increase both metrics.
The potential and the generated result are checked separately. The independent O9 company does not disappear due to resource reduction or replacement of its current owner. This formula explains the conditions of the new creation.
No common score is given. The unknown is not zero, and a big mission statement is no substitute for the right technology or right. The designations Мнс, Мв and Ми are not the scale of materialization M0–M7 and do not define the class of reality R0–R6.
This is a historical transcript from the "BurningBoss" presentation, slide 19. Spacing and subscripts have been edited; compound and arithmetic signs are preserved.
Current author's revision: the scale of the new world is revealed as Mv × Mi, and Mv contains five components: Θ × Tr_O × Kv × Mission × Kstv. The historical formula is the source of part of the content of the tool; the new model does not declare it algebraically identical.
The old presentation has a numerical scale of management levels. It is not transferred to O0–O9: the new level is confirmed by the work authority and the result, not the number of floors of the organizational chart. Stacking technologies or adding systemics does not allow this model to compensate for missing critical technology. Mi is revealed as a set of required capabilities, without a new arithmetic index.
Presentation: formula, slide 19 · Involvement of managers, slide 18 · Historical copy of the main.
In the historical copy of the master, the record contains two technological symbols; in the presentation, three technologies are decoded separately. The earlier author's dialogue has other notations and external multiplication by systematicity. We do not declare these versions to be mathematically identical. The nine transition formula relationship below is an educational development based on the O0–O9 canon.
Focus shows what is especially important to create at this transition. Each conclusion about the level of the company needs its own facts.
| CROSSING | CHANGE FOCUS | EXTERNAL EVIDENCE |
|---|
A separate coordinate of AI maturity in the company. The block shows the 10 levels of AI implementation: who initiates the action, where the AI works, what it changes, what fact the level proves, and what the level does not yet mean.
The key process is originally designed for people and digital artists to work together.
AI01–AI10 is a separate coordinate from O0–O9. It shows how AI is changing a company's ability to operate.
I manage one employee
I create posts,
which produce the result
Practice:
Entrance:
Freedom for:
In the manual, each change has its own animation, practical work and verification criteria. The selected example is not an evaluation of your company.
The accepted role sets the direction. Knowledge, understanding and training translate into ability that can be seen in real work and under stress.
The role has already been accepted. Now the ability to act changes.
The customer, the offer, the channel and the way to get the corresponding demand. The result: a clear mechanism for attracting the client.
Need, offer, conditions, customer decision and transfer of order. The result: a negotiated, actionable sale.
Input, method, quality standard, acceptance and correction. The result: the promised valuable end product.
Technologies can be developed, acquired or mastered. It is important to be able to test them and reproduce the result by other people. List of components: scaling formula; transition criterion: canon O0–O9.
These conditions should be considered separately for a specific person and his company. The transition number does not automatically set its state.
In this learning model, personal scales are not filled. A conclusion about readiness requires facts and a conversation with a person.
Under stress, the usual way of responding seems to be the fastest. Here you can see the trigger, the dependency loop and the specific action that breaks it.
The same cloud image is now deployed into a working organization. The level determines the reproducibility, and the proof appears in the real work cycles.
The diagram shows the new capacity. The number of nodes is conditional.
Freedom has a specific meaning at each transition. The scale of the next plan is determined separately.
The transition requires time, attention, strength and a clear plan. I determine what keeps my attention, how to organize this load and what to free the resource for.
A resource has a direction: for which next creation is it needed?
Appeals, pending cases and decisions that come back to me again.
Determining what to complete, who to delegate work to, and when to return to what is truly my decision.
To create the next capacity of the company and the practice of the new role.
Time and attention are allocated for the next step; real work progresses without constantly returning to the previous workload.
The scene shows available attention and its focus as one aspect of life force. We consider the person's condition separately: we agree on the real load, time for recovery and training, and the necessary support.
The mission sets the direction and value. A specific intention describes what is to appear. The selection criteria link this direction to everyday decisions.
An independent component of the formula. Selecting an O-transition does not automatically change the mission or set its "size".
Facts and consequences help clarify ideas and decisions.
I associate my own choices with value for those who will live or work in this new reality.
Verification: it is clear for whom this direction exists and why I choose it.
For whom do I create value? What change do I consider worthy of my own participation?
What result should appear in this project, under what conditions and by what horizon?
What do I choose, what do I refuse and what consequences do I take into account for other participants?
Working definition in this edition: Mission means the mission and focus of creation. The scope of the declaration is not proof of value, and the absence of written wording does not mean zero. Mission and specific goals are related but have different levels of generalization.
Knowing how to create becomes a competency when I can apply it: define the idea, test the assumptions, organize the implementation and get an external result.
Independent creation route. Changing a company's O-level does not grant an ability level, an R reality class, or an M materialization degree.
↶ At every step: feedback and correction of the model.
I describe what should begin to exist, for whom it will work and on what conditions it depends.
Verification: there is a clear design model, a list of key assumptions and an external outcome criterion.
In the ARCHYX materials, creation competence is considered through individual observable abilities. Kstv in this formula summarizes the educational focus; the rule for reducing the profile to one numerical coefficient is not specified.
Source status: approved direction / architectural candidate. Behavioral criteria, context rules, and evidence are still being developed. This animation is a tutorial synthesis, not an approved full technology for creating new worlds.
Creator Capability System V0.1 · Status of methodology and limits of use.
Different foci of competence: Kv refers to the construction and ownership of a business tool, Kstv refers to the creation of a new idea in reality. Shared skills are possible; we do not count them twice. The proof is the application and the result, not just the knowledge of the terms.
"I provide income through personal intervention" → "I create leaders and rules by which the company plans, gets results and corrects deviations."
Example for O4 → O5. This scene reveals the practical meaning of the new role: managers learn to use a shared financial model, gain real leverage and go through the work cycle.
We agree on the definition of income, expenses, marginal income, funds and data sources.
We combine sales, capacity, costs and cash flows. We define break-even factors.
Managers are given responsibility for controllable factors, resources and decision limits.
Managers make routine decisions within their boundaries and organize the product through teams.
A single reporting standard shows the product, variances, data and dependencies between functions.
Managers agree on actions, responsible parties and deadlines. The next cycle shows the result of the correction.
After a weak week, the owner himself changes plans, negotiates with customers, allocates costs and fixes functions. Managers fill out the tables, and the management cycle remains with the owner.
The owner sets the financial framework and organizes the coordination of managers. Everyone brings facts, options, and decisions within rights. The actual deviation is handled by this loop, with agreed escalation for exceptions.
We decompose the joint break-even into agreed manageable factors. Sales can be responsible for revenue and margin revenue within pricing rights; operations — for quality, capacity and manageable costs; finance — for the reliability of the model, the forecast of funds and the established controls. The specific distribution depends on the authority in your company.
The manager's assessment takes into account the indicators controlled by him. The evaluation of the function itself additionally takes into account its full economy. Explanation of the controllability principle · ACCA.
| Transition | New ability and job | Observed check |
|---|---|---|
| O0 → O1 | I understand economics I determine the product, price, variable and fixed costs, payment and the need for funds. | Reordering keeps the same model viable. |
| O1 → O2 | I hand over execution with economy I take into account the cost of another performer, the quality, processing and resources of the post. | The product was accepted without my production modification; actual costs are visible. |
| O2 → O3 | I reproduce productive posts I compare the cost, download, power and product of new posts. | Restarting works; the attached posts do not hide the damage or my work. |
| O3 → O4 | I transfer the financial levers to the manager I give the first manager data, resources, limits and the right to make decisions about the controlled result. | The manager himself corrects a significant deviation within the limits of his mandate. |
| O4 → O5 | I am building a joint cycle of leaders We reconcile income, capacity, costs and funds. Everyone sees their contribution and dependencies. | Managers agree on the plan and correction, the owner does not collect every decision manually. |
| O5 → O6 | I transfer the development of the economy to the function The function owner changes performance, quality and cost; justifies the investment. | The function is improved by its manager program. |
| O6 → O7 | I confirm the rights of financial decisions Limits, consultation, approval, suspension and escalation have clear rules. | A normal decision in the limit is implemented without the hidden permission of the owner. |
| O7 → O8 | I am passing on a complete cycle to the CEO The CEO is responsible for operational and financial results within the agreed framework; the owner or board oversees and issues capital. | Another CEO role carries out a significant cycle of planning, execution and correction. |
| O8 → O9 | Making the financial context transferable Data, rights, obligations, controls, accesses and decision history are stored within the company. | Change-of-control checking detects and removes dependencies on memory and owner identity. |
For a homogeneous product with a fixed price and variable costs per unit, the basic calculation is as follows:
Break-even volume = Fixed costs ÷ (Price − Variable cost per unit)The denominator must be positive. A multi-product company needs a consistent sales and margin structure. Cash flow is planned separately: payment terms and obligations can create a shortage of funds even with a profitable model.
Financial planning in administrative sources provides a cycle of resource planning and control. The break-even model and the principle of controllability complement its financial basis. Basic formula · SBA.
The register covers found and read materials. For each tool, the minimum working version, the following application, the result and the verification are shown. Binding to O-junctions is suggested for this guide.
Start with a version that is sufficient for your current product and risk. One short working document can combine several tools. Rights, data, coordination, and application autonomy are explored in subsequent transitions. If the base is missing, it is restored at the current level.
Provides common direction
For whom and what value do we create.
O4→O5: goals of functions; O7→O8: CEO mandate.
What to create: Formulated goal and idea, product and addressee.
How to check the application: Different participants equally explain the result for which they make a decision.
Tool sources: Administrative scale template · Administrative scale. Sequence of steps · How to achieve your goals · Creation of a strategic management system
Shows the subject of the transition
At each transition: an observable fact, the next ability, and a gap.
A new observable ability at each level.
What to create: Description of fact, desired capability and specific gap.
How to check the application: Observed deviations are separated from assumptions; the next step closes the gap.
Tool sources: Perfect picture · Administrative scale template · Administrative scale. Sequence of steps · How to achieve your goals
Coordinates the objectives, rules and implementation of
A short agreed version for the first product.
O2→O3: functions; O4→O5: cascade; O7→O8: Owner/CEO.
What to create: Agreed administrative scale of the transition.
How to check the application: The program, the statistics, and the product support one goal; contradictions are eliminated.
Tool sources: Administrative scale template · Administrative scale. Sequence of steps · How to achieve your goals
Defines the completed value result
Product, recipient and confirmed exchange.
O1→O2: fasting; O2→O3: by-products; O5→O6: functions.
What to create: Product passport and acceptance criteria.
How to check the application: The recipient accepts the result; the number of actions does not replace the product.
Tool sources: Administrative scale template · Administrative scale. Sequence of steps · How to achieve your goals · Basic data about the organization chart · Post products, mini hat and control sheet
Chooses a way to achieve the objective
A way to get the desired result with the available resources.
O5→O6: development of functions; O7→O8: strategy and limits.
What to create: A plan with resources and assumptions.
How to check the application: The person in charge can explain how the plan closes the gap and how it is backed up.
Tool sources: Battle plans · Administrative scale template · Administrative scale. Sequence of steps · How to achieve your goals · Creation of a strategic management system
Turns the plan into controlled execution
For each transition: ability, steps, responsible and resource.
O5→O6: the manager himself leads the development program of the function.
What to create: Program with final steps, resource and responsible.
How to check the application: The products of the steps are obtained, and the required ability acts in the work.
Tool sources: How to formulate tasks for programs · How to formulate tasks for programs · Program template · Program maxims · Administrative scale template · Administrative scale. Sequence of steps · How to achieve your goals · Creation of a strategic management system
Details the complex step of the program
When one program step needs a separate sequence.
O4→O5: cross-functional projects.
What to create: Project with output and dependencies.
How to check the application: Project completion closes a specific program step.
Tool sources: Administrative scale template · Administrative scale. Sequence of steps · How to achieve your goals
Makes errands doable
Product, deadline, responsible, resource and verified prerequisites.
O3→O4: the manager himself sets and proves the tasks.
What to create: Task: result, deadline, resource, responsible.
How to check the application: It is possible to check the completion unambiguously; prerequisites for execution have been checked.
Tool sources: How to formulate tasks for programs · How to formulate tasks for programs · Program template · Administrative scale. Sequence of steps
Passes the required action for the role
Clear assignment within the role.
O3→O4: through a supervisor, without a second in command.
What to create: Fixed assignment with confirmed understanding.
How to check the application: The execution took place without conflicting commands and a hidden second-in-command.
Tool sources: Administrative scale template · Administrative scale. Sequence of steps · Basic data about the organization chart
Combines daily work with strategy
Own short plan for products.
O1→O2: performer; O3→O4: manager; O4→O5: aligned horizontal.
What to create: Weekly/daily grocery plan.
How to check the application: The plan is executed or adjusted according to the fact; employment is not a substitute for contributing to a cause.
Tool sources: Battle plans · CHER training program
Fixes playable solutions
The first rules of repetitive work.
O2→O3: standard; O6→O7: decision and conflict rules.
What to create: Brief policy with scope.
How to check the application: A typical issue is resolved by policy without new owner intervention.
Tool sources: Administrative scale template · Administrative scale. Sequence of steps · CHER training program
Links the products of the posts to the company
Stages of the first function and its inputs/outputs.
O2→O3: reproduced posts; O4→O5: junctions of functions.
What to create: Map of inputs, by-products, outputs and recipients.
How to check the application: The next link receives a suitable product without manual translation by the owner.
Tool sources: Basic data about the organization chart · Post products, mini hat and control sheet
Shows responsibility and working relationships
Post and its product; one person can occupy several roles.
O2→O3: map of posts; O3→O5: real management lines.
What to create: Organizational chart of posts, products and real management lines.
How to check the application: The job request gets to the right post; the scheme corresponds to the actual work.
Tool sources: Basic data about the organization chart
It conveys the way of working at the post
Product, knowledge, actions, quality, interactions.
O2→O3: reproducible hat; O3→O4: Chief's Hat.
What to create: Mini Hat: Product, Knowledge, Actions, Quality, Interactions.
How to check the application: Another executor receives the product according to the transmitted method.
Tool sources: Post products, mini hat and control sheet · Basic data about the organization chart
Converts explanation to skill
Explanation, reproduction and independent practical product.
O2→O3: next performer; O5→O6: the supervisor teaches the system.
What to create: Checklist with exercises and product samples.
How to check the application: A person explains and reproduces the work, and not just notes what he has read.
Tool sources: CHER training program · FP instruction with a practical task · Post products, mini hat and control sheet
Secures the post with a capable executor
Check the ability to create the desired product.
O3→O4: manager; O7→O8: CEO with cycle check.
What to create: Selection criteria, trial product, plan of introduction.
How to check the application: A person creates the desired product; the manager has a proven management cycle.
Tool sources: Basic data about the organization chart
Shows the dynamics of production
Exchange, quality and repeatability facts.
O1→O2: fasting; O4→O5: single definitions; O5→O6: function.
What to create: Definition of statistics, data source, period and graph.
How to check the application: Different people get the same number from verified primary data.
Tool sources: Administrative scale template · Administrative scale. Sequence of steps · How to achieve your goals · Basic data about the organization chart
Makes the area state visible
Product, fact, deviation, decision and confirmation.
O3→O4: manager's area; O4→O5: unified reporting.
What to create: Single report: product, fact, deviation, action, evidence.
How to check the application: The manager sees changes in time and makes decisions without manual data collection by the owner.
Tool sources: Basic data about the organization chart · CHER training program
Closes execution cycle
Close the cycle of the task with a proven product.
O3→O4: check and correction by the manager.
What to create: A short report with the result and confirmation.
How to check the application: Performance is tested by the product, not by the words "done".
Tool sources: CHER training program
Prepares a solution without overturning the problem
Simple questions with data and a proposal for a solution.
O3→O4: ready decision of the manager; O6→O7: escalation according to the rules.
What to create: ZRS: situation, data, proposed solution.
How to check the application: An empowered role makes an informed decision without reassembling the entire situation.
Tool sources: CHER training program · Regulation of financial planning · FP instruction with a practical task
Reduces losses and repeat requests
Record orders, answers and decisions.
O2→O3: by fasting; O4→O5: between functions.
What to create: Message routes, statuses, storage location.
How to check the application: The order, the decision and the answer are there; the cycle does not depend on personal memory.
Tool sources: CHER training program · Basic data about the organization chart
Coordinates work by product and resources
Brief coordination by product and plan.
O3→O4: manager's cycle; O4→O5: interfunctional junctions.
What to create: The rhythm of coordination, plans, agreements at the junctions.
How to check the application: The conflict of plans is resolved, the responsible and subsequent products are clear.
Tool sources: Battle plans · CHER training program
Develops the independence of another person
Explain, listen, correct without changing the job.
O3→O4: manager development; O5→O6: function authorship.
What to create: Practiced conversation: facts, understanding, solutions, feedback.
How to check the application: The employee or manager adjusts the work himself; the owner does not replace it.
Tool sources: CHER training program
Separates the real state from the report
Checking the product by the recipient.
O1→O2: acceptance; O4→O5: independent visibility; O5→O6: system correction.
What to create: Acceptance criteria, selection of checks, confirmation.
How to check the application: The error is discovered after the fact, and the verification does not close all decisions to the owner.
Tool sources: Administrative scale. Sequence of steps · Basic data about the organization chart
Removes recurring defect
Eliminate the source of the recurring defect.
O5→O6: the function owner himself finds and corrects the cause.
What to create: Program to correct the cause and check the result.
How to check the application: The repeated case does not reproduce the previous error or deviation in time to correct the responsible role.
Tool sources: Basic data about the organization chart · Perfect picture
Connecting money, resources and solutions
Visible money, expenses, obligations and decisions; the exact model of the economy is attached separately.
O3→O4: budget and limits; O4→O5: general cycle; O7→O8: CEO.
What to create: Financial cycle: data, plan, decision, execution, plan/fact.
How to check the application: Decisions are made based on reliable data within the scope of authority; the payment does not change the economic result.
Tool sources: Regulation of financial planning · FP instruction with a practical task
Makes regular needs and reserves visible
Consider regular obligations and needs.
O3→O5: costs by function, reserves and justification.
What to create: List of expenses and funds with grounds and data owners.
How to check the application: Mandatory payments are taken into account; fund rates are justified for a specific company.
Tool sources: Regulation of financial planning · FP instruction with a practical task
Manages expenses and liabilities
Proportionate rules of expenses, when funds are disposed of by an employee.
O3→O5: managers' decisions within limits; exceptions have a route.
What to create: Applications, approved limits, directive and implementation report.
How to check the application: Obligations are accepted by the authorized role, the fact is verified with the decision; route has an exception.
Tool sources: Regulation of financial planning · FP instruction with a practical task
Gives place to joint decisions
When functions, resources, and budget need to be aligned.
O6→O7: authority architecture; O7→O8: Owner/Board/CEO.
What to create: Mandate of the body, composition, subject of decisions, protocols.
How to check the application: The issue is resolved by the appropriate authority, without duplication or informal owner veto rights.
Tool sources: Regulation of financial planning · Basic data about the organization chart · Creation of a strategic management system
Launches Joint Strategic Execution
Joint plan, responsible programs and real agreement.
O5→O6: function programs; O7→O8: Strategy/CEO.
What to create: Strategic plan, responsible programs, control and training.
How to check the application: The programs are written and run by responsible people; results are aligned with strategy.
Tool sources: Creation of a strategic management system
There are no tools for this request. Try another word or all transitions.
Administrative scale, products, organization of posts, training, statistics, communication, coordination, programs and financial cycle have indicated methodical sources.
Function holder passports, authority architecture, CEO separation, succession and asset transferability are based on the O0–O9 canon.
Marketing surveys, campaigns, sales, public relations and in-depth production analysis are added by product and current company limit.
Primary sources of additional modules: Hubbard College, Course Descriptions, p. 64–71. The basic families of organization, statistics, finance, communication and training are also listed in Model of Admin Know-How.
Organizational capabilities O0–O9 are based on the ARCHYX canon. Roles, exercises, tools, traps and methods of verification are summarized in a learning model of the transition. It needs to be adapted to the product, risks and actual structure of a particular company.
The registry groups the tools of the read corpus. It remains open to addition by other primary sources of administrative technology.
Historical examples are adapted to the content of transitions: the parameters of a specific company, its job titles and personal rules of the author do not establish general requirements for each owner.